I2P Address: [http://git.idk.i2p]

Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 5c5af2e8 authored by zzz's avatar zzz
Browse files

meeting 248

parent 946dd75c
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
20:00:46 <zzz> 0) Hi
20:00:46 <zzz> 1) Tails status (pr0ng) http://zzz.i2p/topics/2108
20:00:46 <zzz> 2) 0.9.26 planning update (zzz)
20:00:46 <zzz> 3) HOPE planning update (zzz) http://zzz.i2p/topics/1968
20:00:50 <zzz> 0) Hi
20:00:52 <zzz> hi
20:01:01 <pr0ng> Hey Eeepers
20:01:22 <zzz> 1) Tails status (pr0ng) http://zzz.i2p/topics/2108
20:01:32 <zzz> ok, a lot's happened on tails in the last month
20:01:33 <pr0ng> Hi zzz
20:01:47 <Irc2PGuest33835> hey
20:02:01 <zzz> 0.9.25 got into tails 2.3, and 0.9.26 may or may not line up with 2.4. pr0ng would you please give us a brief report?
20:02:51 <pr0ng> Not sure about the 'not line up' part - is that the I2p persistence support?
20:03:05 <zzz> i mean schedule-wise
20:03:36 <pr0ng> Basically, this release was taken from the deb.i2p.no repo and uploaded to Tail APT repo by 'anonym'
20:04:00 <pr0ng> I tested the release in isolation on the Tails image, fairly extensively
20:04:20 <pr0ng> I've been communicating with anonym to get a handle on what goes where and when
20:04:28 <zzz> and I told them you had tested it... perhaps that's why anonym did the rest?
20:04:48 <pr0ng> Very nice and accommodating individual, gave me lot's of advice and help
20:05:02 <pr0ng> I now have a handle on exactly how the release is tested and deployed
20:05:27 <zzz> is what happened for .25/2.3 the actual process, or are they expecting you to do more next time?
20:05:42 <pr0ng> Indeed. They took the .deb from I2P straight through
20:06:40 <pr0ng> There's a couple of scripts that dictate how I2P is deployed - they / anonym used those and I now know where they are and how to build/transfer for inclusion
20:07:29 <zzz> ok so you will be doing more next time
20:07:55 <pr0ng> They can take from the deb.i2p2.no or other methods - they are highlighting the persistence angle at the moment - I may need to do other to get that working next release, but I will find out for certain.
20:08:20 <eche|on> great so far
20:08:30 <pr0ng> c'est possible - looks like I'll be able to 'deliver' the release myself this time
20:08:33 <zzz> so you've now started to get into their oustanding issues, the first of which is persistence?
20:08:48 <pr0ng> indeed - I'm pleased it went through and I learnt the requirements
20:10:09 <pr0ng> indeed - I will be looking at the outstanding issues - the persistence element is more of a 'nice to have' it seems, but it was highlighted in our conversation.
20:10:24 <zzz> what would your deadline be for me to have 0.9.26 in deb.i2p2.no in order for you to get it into tails 2.4?
20:11:48 <pr0ng> I will need to determine that - that's something I can't be precise on atm
20:12:01 <pr0ng> I will certainly come back with an answer for that
20:12:13 <zzz> ok, let me know, even if just a guess.
20:12:22 <zzz> anything else on 1) ?
20:12:40 <pr0ng> I will, certainly.
20:12:52 <pr0ng> So far so good methinx.
20:13:04 <zzz> thanks again, you're doing great work, glad to have you on it
20:13:34 <zzz> 2) 0.9.26 planning update (zzz)
20:13:36 <pr0ng> I'm glad to help - it's been a steep curve, but I'm much more comfortable with the process and the requirements. :)
20:14:11 <zzz> I've finished the major parts of .26 -- addressbook subscription protocol, and CRLs in the news feed. And we've propped GMP 6
20:14:48 <xmz> zzz: has anyone reported a working family config from using the java i2p console?
20:14:48 <xmz> zzz: I've never got it to work
20:14:50 <zzz> I'm turning to bug fixing now and that will be my focus until the release. I'm hot on the trail of a strange timer bug that I think is the root cause of some issues people are seeing
20:15:32 <zzz> xmz, other than me, I haven't heard any reports of failure or success
20:15:34 <pr0ng> apologies for my ignorance - is 'propped GMP 6' 'dropped libgmp'?
20:15:42 <zzz> if you're having issues, please open a ticket
20:15:57 <xmz> okay sure I will test in a bit and report
20:16:05 <zzz> propped = propagate = merge from another (development) branch
20:16:25 <zzz> at this point I haven't set a .26 date but late May or early june looks likely
20:16:40 <pr0ng> Ah. K. thanks for that :)
20:17:14 <zzz> thanks to eche|on for doing some dev builds. We'd really like to see somebody step up and do a real, automatic, dev build site
20:17:18 <eche|on> I vote for 2nd june week
20:17:50 <zzz> As some of you may have seen, I declared that we're slowing down our releases, from 6-8 weeks to 8-10.
20:17:52 <eche|on> I want to, but my time is limited currently
20:18:32 <eche|on> yes, it is ok
20:18:32 <zzz> This is a byproduct of less testing, me doing a lot of stuff that kytv was doing, and a general reduction in activity all around
20:19:18 <zzz> there's also almost no participation in reviewing proposals and getting ready for the hard stuff coming up this year, esp. NTCP2 and related
20:20:10 <zzz> there's also the proposed 'summer of x' that I was hoping for an update from sadie on. If we do move forward with that, it's going to slow releases down a lot
20:20:47 <zzz> I can tell you there's nobody working ahead on .27 planning or coding at all right now
20:20:52 <zzz> anything else on 2) ?
20:21:52 <zzz> 3) HOPE planning update (zzz) http://zzz.i2p/topics/1968
20:22:32 <zzz> I have continued to fail at getting a commitment for meeting space from Lance for HOPE
20:22:51 <zzz> so I still can't give anybody guidance if you're making plans to attend
20:23:15 <zzz> sadie was going to meet with him last week, she hasn't responded to my query as to whether she got an answer from him
20:23:25 <eche|on> hmm
20:24:05 <zzz> If anybody has a hard date on when you need to know, speak up. I feel bad about nagging Lance but it isn't working at all
20:24:26 <xmpre> zzz: I have a jenkins server set up for i2pd, I could set one up for java i2p if there is interest?
20:24:44 <zzz> yeah xmpre, for sure
20:25:20 <zzz> anything else on 3) ?
20:27:05 <eche|on> zzz: I still got that ticket^^
20:27:15 <zzz> I saw in the scrollback above that str4d and sadie had issues with the standard meeting time, and something about shifting timezone base that I didn't understand. If you two want to negotiate with the europeans and come up with something that would work for everybody, please do
20:27:20 <zzz> anything else for the meeting?
20:27:55 <pr0ng> I'm planning to turn up at I2PCon-2 - are there any ideas on when/where for that?
20:28:28 <pr0ng> ... reading, did I miss that already!?
20:28:33 <zzz> I don't think there will be a i2pcon 2.
20:28:50 <zzz> perhaps a small meetup in Toronto in the fall, as a tiny facsimile
20:28:55 <pr0ng> Shame
20:29:11 <zzz> if you want to catch some i2p ppl in person, best shot is HOPE and CCC
20:29:18 * zzz warms up the baffer
20:29:31 <pr0ng> I'll pencil that in then.
20:29:54 * zzz *bafs* the meeting closed
I2P dev meeting, May 3, 2016 @ 20:00 UTC
========================================
Quick recap
-----------
* **Present:**
eche|on,
pr0ng,
xmpre,
xmz,
zzz
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment