I2P Address: [http://git.idk.i2p]

Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Unverified Commit 18eccd7c authored by zzz's avatar zzz
Browse files

still more prop. 167 updates

parent 97909be4
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -365,14 +365,21 @@ in the leaseset of the target. ...@@ -365,14 +365,21 @@ in the leaseset of the target.
Compatibility Compatibility
=============== ===============
No issues. All known implementations currently ignore the options field in LS2, LS2: No issues. All known implementations currently ignore the options field in LS2,
and correctly skip over a non-empty options field. and correctly skip over a non-empty options field.
This was verified in recent testing by both Java I2P and i2pd. This was verified in recent testing by both Java I2P and i2pd.
LS2 was implemented in 0.9.38 in 2016 and is well-supported by all router implementations. LS2 was implemented in 0.9.38 in 2016 and is well-supported by all router implementations.
The design does not require special support or caching or any changes in the floodfills. The design does not require special support or caching or any changes in the floodfills.
'_' is not a valid character in i2p hostnames. Naming: '_' is not a valid character in i2p hostnames.
I2CP: Lookup types 2-4 should not be sent to routers below the minimum API version
at which it is supported (TBD).
SAM: Java SAM server ignores additional keys/values such as OPTIONS=true.
i2pd should as well, to be verified.
SAM clients will not get the additional values in the reply unless requested with OPTIONS=true.
No version bump should be necessary.
Migration Migration
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment