Post-Quantum Crypto Protocols
Contents
- Overview
- Goals
- Non-Goals
- Threat Model
- Design
- Specification
- Overhead Analysis
- Security Analysis
- Type Preferences
- Implementation Notes
- Router Compatibility
- Priorities and Rollout
- Migration
- Issues
- References
Overview
While research and competition for suitable post-quantum (PQ) cryptography have been proceeding for a decade, the choices have not become clear until recently.
We started looking at the implications of PQ crypto in 2022 [FORUM].
TLS standards added hybrid encryption support in the last two years and it now is used for a significant portion of encrypted traffic on the internet due to support in Chrome and Firefox [CLOUDFLARE].
NIST recently finalized and published the recommended algorithms for post-quantum cryptography [NIST-PQ]. Several common cryptography libraries now support the NIST standards or will be releasing support in the near future.
Both [CLOUDFLARE] and [NIST-PQ] recommend that migration start immediately. See also the 2022 NSA PQ FAQ [NSA-PQ]. I2P should be a leader in security and cryptography. Now is the time to implement the recommended algorithms. Using our flexible crypto type and signature type system, we will add types for hybrid crypto, and for PQ and hybrid signatures.
Goals
- Select PQ-resistant algorithms
- Add PQ-only and hybrid algorithms to I2P protocols where appropriate
- Define multiple variants
- Select best variants after implementation, testing, analysis, and research
- Add support incrementally and with backward compatibility
Non-Goals
- Don't change one-way (Noise N) encryption protocols
- Don't move away from SHA256, not threatened near-term by PQ
- Don't select the final preferred variants at this time
Threat Model
- Routers at the OBEP or IBGW, possibly colluding, storing garlic messages for later decryption (forward secrecy)
- Network observers storing transport messages for later decryption (forward secrecy)
- Network participants forging signatures for RI, LS, streaming, datagrams, or other structures
Design
We will support the NIST FIPS 203 and 204 standards [FIPS203] [FIPS204] which are based on, but NOT compatible with, CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium (versions 3.1, 3, and older).
Key Exchange
We will support key exchange in the following protocols:
Proto | Noise Type | Support PQ? | Support Hybrid? |
---|---|---|---|
NTCP2 | XK | no | yes |
SSU2 | XK | no | yes |
Ratchet | IK | no | yes |
TBM | N | no | no |
NetDB | N | no | no |
PQ KEM provides ephemeral keys only, and does not directly support static-key handshakes such as Noise XK and IK. While there is some recent research [PQ-WIREGUARD] on adapting Wireguard (IK) for pure PQ crypto, there are several open questions, and this approach is unproven.
Noise N does not use a two-way key exchange and so it is not suitable for hybrid encryption.
So we will support hybrid encryption only, for NTCP2, SSU2, and Ratchet. We will define the three ML-KEM variants as in [FIPS203], for 3 new encryption types total. Hybrid types will only be defined in combination with X25519.
The new encryption types are:
Type | Code |
---|---|
MLKEM512_X25519 | 5 |
MLKEM768_X25519 | 6 |
MLKEM1024_X25519 | 7 |
Overhead will be substantial. Typical message 1 and 2 sizes (for XK and IK) are currently around 100 bytes (before any additional payload). This will increase by 8x to 15x depending on algorithm.
Signatures
We will support PQ and hybrid signatures in the following structures:
Type | Support PQ? | Support Hybrid? |
---|---|---|
RouterInfo | yes | yes |
LeaseSet | yes | yes |
Streaming SYN/SYNACK/Close | yes | yes |
Repliable Datagrams | yes | yes |
Datagram2 (prop. 163) | yes | yes |
I2CP create session msg | yes | yes |
SU3 files | yes | yes |
X.509 certificates | yes | yes |
Java keystores | yes | yes |
So we will support both PQ-only and hybrid signatures. We will define the three ML-DSA variants as in [FIPS204], as well as three hybrid variants with Ed25519 prehash for SU3 files only, for 9 new signature types total. Hybrid types will only be defined in combination with Ed25519. We will use the standard ML-DSA, NOT the pre-hash variants (HashML-DSA).
The new signature types are:
Type | Code |
---|---|
MLDSA44_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 12 |
MLDSA65_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 13 |
MLDSA87_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 14 |
MLDSA44 | 15 |
MLDSA65 | 16 |
MLDSA87 | 17 |
MLDSA44_Ed25519ph | 18 |
MLDSA65_Ed25519ph | 19 |
MLDSA87_Ed25519ph | 20 |
X.509 certificates and other DER encodings will use the composite structures and OIDs defined in [COMPOSITE-SIGS].
Overhead will be substantial. Typical Ed25519 destination and router identity sizes are 391 bytes. These will increase by 3.5x to 6.8x depending on algorithm. Ed25519 signatures are 64 bytes. These will increase by 38x to 76x depending on algorithm. Typical signed RouterInfo, LeaseSet, repliable datagrams, and signed streaming messages are about 1KB. These will increase by 3x to 8x depending on algorithm.
As the new destination and router identity types will not contain padding, they will not be compressible. Sizes of destinations and router identities that are gzipped in-transit will increase by 12x - 38x depending on algorithm.
TODO: Add RSA4096 hybrid types for su3?
Legal Combinations
For Destinations, the new signature types are supported with all encryption types in the leaseset. Set the encryption type in the key certificate to NULL (255).
For RouterIdentities, ElGamal encryption type is deprecated. The new signature types are supported with X25519 (type 4) encryption only. The new encryption types will be indicated in the RouterAddresses. The encryption type in the key certificate will continue to be type 4.
New Crypto Required
- ML-KEM (formerly CRYSTALS-Kyber) [FIPS203]
- ML-DSA (formerly CRYSTALS-Dilithium) [FIPS204]
- SHA3-128 (formerly Keccak-256) [FIPS202] Used only for SHAKE128
- SHA3-256 (formerly Keccak-512) [FIPS202]
- SHAKE128 and SHAKE256 (XOF extensions to SHA3-128 and SHA3-256) [FIPS202]
Test vectors for SHA3-256, SHAKE128, and SHAKE256 are at [NIST-VECTORS].
Note that the Java bouncycastle library supports all the above. C++ library support will be in OpenSSL 3.5 [OPENSSL].
Alternatives
We will not support [FIPS205] (Sphincs+), it is much much slower and bigger than ML-DSA. We will not support the upcoming FIPS206 (Falcon), it is not yet standardized. We will not support NTRU or other PQ candidates that were not standardized by NIST.
Specification
Common Structures
Update the sections and tables in the common structures document [COMMON] as follows:
PublicKey
The new Public Key types are:
Type | Public Key Length | Since | Usage |
---|---|---|---|
MLKEM512_X25519 | 32 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for Leasesets only, not for RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM768_X25519 | 32 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for Leasesets only, not for RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM1024_X25519 | 32 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for Leasesets only, not for RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM512 | 800 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for handshakes only, not for Leasesets, RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM768 | 1184 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for handshakes only, not for Leasesets, RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM1024 | 1568 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for handshakes only, not for Leasesets, RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM512_CT | 768 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for handshakes only, not for Leasesets, RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM768_CT | 1088 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for handshakes only, not for Leasesets, RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM1024_CT | 1568 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for handshakes only, not for Leasesets, RIs or Destinations |
NULL | 0 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for destinations with PQ sig types only, not for RIs or Leasesets |
Hybrid public keys are the X25519 key. KEM public keys are the ephemeral PQ key sent from Alice to Bob. Byte order defined in [FIPS203].
MLKEM*_CT keys are not really public keys, they are the "ciphertext" sent from Bob to Alice in the Noise handshake. They are listed here for completeness.
PrivateKey
The new Private Key types are:
Type | Private Key Length | Since | Usage |
---|---|---|---|
MLKEM512_X25519 | 32 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for Leasesets only, not for RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM768_X25519 | 32 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for Leasesets only, not for RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM1024_X25519 | 32 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for Leasesets only, not for RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM512 | 1632 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for handshakes only, not for Leasesets, RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM768 | 2400 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for handshakes only, not for Leasesets, RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM1024 | 3168 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for handshakes only, not for Leasesets, RIs or Destinations |
Hybrid private keys are the X25519 key followed by the PQ key. KEM private keys are the ciphertext sent from Bob to Alice. Byte order defined in [FIPS203].
SigningPublicKey
The new Signing Public Key types are:
Type | Length (bytes) | Since | Usage |
---|---|---|---|
MLDSA44_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 1344 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA65_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 1984 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA87_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 2624 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA44 | 1312 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA65 | 1952 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA87 | 2592 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA44_Ed25519ph | 1344 | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files, not for netdb structures |
MLDSA65_Ed25519ph | 1984 | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files, not for netdb structures |
MLDSA87_Ed25519ph | 2624 | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files, not for netdb structures |
Hybrid signing public keys are the Ed25519 key followed by the PQ key. Byte order defined in [FIPS204].
SigningPrivateKey
The new Signing Private Key types are:
Type | Length (bytes) | Since | Usage |
---|---|---|---|
MLDSA44_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 2592 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA65_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 4064 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA87_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 4928 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA44 | 2560 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA65 | 4032 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA87 | 4896 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA44_Ed25519ph | 2592 | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files, not for netdb structuresSee proposal 169 |
MLDSA65_Ed25519ph | 4064 | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files, not for netdb structuresSee proposal 169 |
MLDSA87_Ed25519ph | 4928 | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files, not for netdb structuresSee proposal 169 |
Hybrid signing private keys are the Ed25519 key followed by the PQ key. Byte order defined in [FIPS204].
Signature
The new Signature types are:
Type | Length (bytes) | Since | Usage |
---|---|---|---|
MLDSA44_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 2484 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA65_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 3373 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA87_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 4691 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA44 | 2420 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA65 | 3309 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA87 | 4627 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA44_Ed25519ph | 2484 | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files, not for netdb structuresSee proposal 169 |
MLDSA65_Ed25519ph | 3373 | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files, not for netdb structuresSee proposal 169 |
MLDSA87_Ed25519ph | 4691 | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files, not for netdb structuresSee proposal 169 |
Hybrid signatures are the Ed25519 signature followed by the PQ signature. Hybrid signatures are verified by verifying both signatures, and failing if either one fails. Byte order defined in [FIPS204].
Key Certificates
The new Signing Public Key types are:
Type | Type Code | Total Public Key Length | Since | Usage |
---|---|---|---|---|
MLDSA44_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 12 | 1344 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA65_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 13 | 1984 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA87_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 14 | 2624 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA44 | 15 | 1312 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA65 | 16 | 1952 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA87 | 17 | 2592 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
MLDSA44_Ed25519ph | 18 | n/a | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files |
MLDSA65_Ed25519ph | 19 | n/a | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files |
MLDSA87_Ed25519ph | 20 | n/a | 0.9.xx | Only for SU3 files |
The new Crypto Public Key types are:
Type | Type Code | Total Public Key Length | Since | Usage |
---|---|---|---|---|
MLKEM512_X25519 | 5 | 32 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for Leasesets only, not for RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM768_X25519 | 6 | 32 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for Leasesets only, not for RIs or Destinations |
MLKEM1024_X25519 | 7 | 32 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169, for Leasesets only, not for RIs or Destinations |
NULL | 255 | 0 | 0.9.xx | See proposal 169 |
Hybrid key types are NEVER included in key certificates; only in leasesets.
For destinations with Hybrid or PQ signature types, use NULL (type 255) for the encryption type, but there is no crypto key, and the entire 384-byte main section is for the signing key.
Destination sizes
Here are lengths for the new Destination types. Enc type for all is NULL (type 255) and the encryption key length is treated as 0. The entire 384-byte section is used for the first part of the signing public key. NOTE: This is different than the spec for the ECDSA_SHA512_P521 and the RSA signature types, where we maintained the 256-byte ElGamal key in the destination even though it was unused.
No padding. Total length is 7 + total key length. Key certificate length is 4 + excess key length.
Example 1319-byte destination byte stream for MLDSA44:
skey[0:383] 5 (932 >> 8) (932 & 0xff) 00 12 00 255 skey[384:1311]
Type | Type Code | Total Public Key Length | Main | Excess | Total Dest Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLDSA44_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 12 | 1344 | 384 | 960 | 1351 |
MLDSA65_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 13 | 1984 | 384 | 1600 | 1991 |
MLDSA87_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 14 | 2624 | 384 | 2240 | 2631 |
MLDSA44 | 15 | 1312 | 384 | 928 | 1319 |
MLDSA65 | 16 | 1952 | 384 | 1568 | 1959 |
MLDSA87 | 17 | 2592 | 384 | 2208 | 2599 |
RouterIdent sizes
Here are lengths for the new Destination types. Enc type for all is X25519 (type 4). The entire 352-byte section after the X28819 public key is used for the first part of the signing public key. No padding. Total length is 39 + total key length. Key certificate length is 4 + excess key length.
Example 1351-byte router identity byte stream for MLDSA44:
enckey[0:31] skey[0:351] 5 (960 >> 8) (960 & 0xff) 00 12 00 4 skey[352:1311]
Type | Type Code | Total Public Key Length | Main | Excess | Total RouterIdent Length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLDSA44_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 12 | 1344 | 352 | 992 | 1383 |
MLDSA65_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 13 | 1984 | 352 | 1632 | 2023 |
MLDSA87_EdDSA_SHA512_Ed25519 | 14 | 2624 | 352 | 2272 | 2663 |
MLDSA44 | 15 | 1312 | 352 | 960 | 1351 |
MLDSA65 | 16 | 1952 | 352 | 1600 | 1991 |
MLDSA87 | 17 | 2592 | 352 | 2240 | 2631 |
Handshake Patterns
Handshakes use [Noise] handshake patterns.
The following letter mapping is used: