From d4ef43b5ca355fed096929cc928b2c475a38c17a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zzz <zzz@i2pmail.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:32:04 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Prop. 159: Clarify csz may be 0 in relay response from
Charlie
---
i2p2www/spec/proposals/159-ssu2.rst | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/i2p2www/spec/proposals/159-ssu2.rst b/i2p2www/spec/proposals/159-ssu2.rst
index 9d847a948..3be475022 100644
--- a/i2p2www/spec/proposals/159-ssu2.rst
+++ b/i2p2www/spec/proposals/159-ssu2.rst
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ SSU2
:author: eyedeekay, orignal, zlatinb, zzz
:created: 2021-09-12
:thread: http://zzz.i2p/topics/2612
- :lastupdated: 2022-07-29
+ :lastupdated: 2022-08-04
:status: Open
:target: 0.9.56
@@ -5719,9 +5719,9 @@ Signature algorithm: Sign the following data with the Charlie's router signing k
- nonce: 4 byte nonce
- timestamp: 4 byte timestamp (seconds)
- ver: 1 byte SSU version
-- csz: 1 byte endpoint (port + IP) size (6 or 18)
-- CharliePort: 2 byte Charlie's port number
-- Charlie IP: (csz - 2) byte Charlie IP address
+- csz: 1 byte endpoint (port + IP) size (0 or 6 or 18)
+- CharliePort: 2 byte Charlie's port number (not present if csz is 0)
+- Charlie IP: (csz - 2) byte Charlie IP address (not present if csz is 0)
If Bob rejects (response code 1-63),
Bob signs the response and includes it in this block.
--
GitLab