diff --git a/meetings/208.rst b/meetings/208.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9543338a64d61693fddd259d9d9a3cfdd534fa53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meetings/208.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+I2P dev meeting, September 8, 2010
+==================================
+
+Quick recap
+-----------
+
+*Present:*
+  duck, eche|on, Mathiasdm, Moru (later on), superuser, whitenoise, zzz
+
+*Website content progress:*
+  The website overhaul has taken 7 weeks so far. Progress is not fast enough. We need more people to join in!
+
+*Website backend progress:*
+  No report yet, welterde could not attend the meeting.
+
+*Location for development discussion:*
+  Most people agree that IRC is not an ideal location to post long-winded development discussions, it's too volatile, not backed up and not everyone can read it. **All developers are advised to post their discussions (or a writeup) to another medium, like zzz.i2p, mailing lists or forum.i2p**.
+  Opinions on the alternatives are a bit more divided. zzz.i2p is currently the location for most discussions, but a number of people also like the idea of a mailing list. No decision has been made on which alternative would be best suited.
+
+*Task appointing and disagreements:*
+  Currently, people appoint themselves to a task by editing the team.html page (this requires monotone access, so there is at least a level of trust implied before being allowed to appoint yourself).
+  However, what happens if people disagree?
+  
+  The discussion pointed out that when disagreeing, a discussion should be held (for example on zzz.i2p). If that doesn't resolve the issue, a vote is a possibility, or the Project Manager (zzz) or repository maintainers (welterde, eche|on) can make a decision.
+
+*Status updates:*
+  Status updates will be started next weekend. They will mostly consist of a 'what work did you do last week?' and 'what work will you do next week?'.
+
+*Development conferences:*
+  Nothing big was mentioned.
+
+*Promoting the usage of the bittorrent protocol inside I2P: pros and cons:*
+  Filesharing in general and bittorrent more specifically can be either good or bad for I2P.
+  On one hand, they could give I2P a bad reputation. On the other hand, they could boost I2P popularity.
+  What to do?
+  
+  Filesharing on I2P will not be promoted specifically. Instead, general usability should be looked at and improved.
+  If people decide to use filesharing on I2P (or any other service, like e-mail or browsing), it should become easier as a result of improving the usability.
+
+Full IRC Log
+------------