{% extends "_layout.html" %} {% block title %}I2P Development Meeting 212{% endblock %} {% block content %}

I2P dev meeting, December 11, 2012 @ 20:00 UTC

Quick recap

Full IRC Log

{% filter escape %}
20:20:09    Not sure where dg is, so I propose that we get the meeting started anyway, continuing on with the agenda from last week (or restarting it if necessary).
20:20:09   (http://zzz.i2p/posts/5779)
20:20:18   Title: zzz.i2p: IRC Meetings (at zzz.i2p)
20:40:14   No one going to reply?
20:41:48   I'm in for a meeting
20:42:09   but IRC was really unstable today
20:51:48   Does someone want to chair and start a meeting? No idea where dg has got to, and I've got to leave partway though so I can't.
20:52:40   Looks like iRelay is on postman's server, so if the chair is also there then disconnects won't affect the meeting log.
21:01:13   meeting was...?
21:01:32  * lillith volunteers to chair once i have zzz.i2p loaded succesfully
21:04:05   meeting is now rite?
21:05:43   yep unless anyone else wants to chair
21:07:16   ok
21:07:16   topics?
21:07:16   So, Carrying on from where we left off last week, orion are you in here?
21:09:52   sounds doable
21:09:54   i'm not sure what for though, seems a little pointless to me at least
21:10:20   to make a more structured environment for helping users
21:10:27   iirc
21:10:48   more like pool resources
21:11:05   +1 on that but iirc someone had to be asked first (the owner of the channel?  who is/was that?)
21:11:13   so combine two fairly dead channels to a less dead one?
21:11:50   yah
21:12:23   okay item 2a: who owns each cannel and what do they think?
21:12:50   2b: is the new channel #i2p or #i2p-help?
21:12:57  * postman owns #i2p and thinks nothing in particular
21:13:31   #i2p should keep its name
21:13:33   2c: ask someone to delete one and redirect people to the other
21:13:38   zzz owns #i2p-help
21:14:10   i suppose the ircd can do a "symlink" of sorts for channels?
21:14:12   i think new users need an obvious 'help' channel to go to first when they connect
21:14:31   otherwise they will just ask in random channels
21:14:51   re: symlink. i will check that
21:16:35   okay, item 2 dealt with?
21:18:16   item 3: website revamp updates.
21:18:35   str4d, any news?
21:18:37   how many are working on that?
21:23:13   psi: afaik only str4d
21:28:17   re: Item 4 : 0.9.4 Console links additions, i think str4d has gone and books isn't here, maybe next week?
21:28:17   lillith, about to go afk
21:28:26   But website page reorganization is basically done.
21:33:45   I'd like some feedback from people on it (navigation and url structure) - see ticket #807 for the live url
21:33:48   http://trac.i2p2.i2p/ticket/807 - (accepted enhancement) - Revamp of website
21:33:50   And that ticket also lists the next todo items for the revamp.
21:33:50   okay, thanks :)
21:34:09   item 5 ; 0.9.4 release
21:35:46   zzz, are you still aiming for mid-december?
21:39:52   monday. see also /topic and http://zzz.i2p/topics/1252
21:39:55   and re: console link additions, that agenda item can be pushed out 6 weeks for 0.9.5
21:45:02   okay thanks :)
21:45:09   item 6 : any notes from participants
21:45:09   ... anyone?
21:45:09   notes?
21:45:09   anything you wish to add
21:45:09   the most common complaint from new users is that it's slow at start
21:45:22   is there any way to address that?
21:49:54   make the installer include RIs could help on the startup speed. But it's not a flawless solution
21:49:54   what if dose RIs goes down, or high load, etc etc
21:49:54   is there a "faster" way to initial seed besides prebundling?
21:49:54   Meeh, is your reseed server script at all a bottleneck? is it slowing down reseeding at all?
21:49:54   higher the limit before the router stop reseeding to 2-300.. But not a flawless idea either
21:49:54   Meeh,surely any solution would be better than none
21:49:54   it slows the server down if it's much used since it's a write lock on sqlite
21:49:56   I should make a mysql version, and those reseeders that could use it, would help a lot
21:51:20   prebundling RIs could only speed up initial startup; worst case is that it's the same as now
21:51:20   then the file/db lock wouldn't be a bottleneck anymore
21:52:49   or whatever else *sql as long as it run as a server
22:01:     orion dosen't seem to be here, and i don't see how we can go on without him
22:04:     item 7: next meeting
22:06:     pre-bundling has some strong arguments against it, they are available on zzz.i2p
22:07:     i'l leave this to dg , presumably it will be 8.00 UTC next tuesday (18th)
22:08:     topiltzin, i'l take a look
22:09:     I'd say this meeting is now officially over then :)
{% endfilter %}
{# TODO: pygments #}
{% endblock %}