Fix several VTBM read/write bugs after testing

This commit is contained in:
zzz
2010-02-03 14:16:05 +00:00
parent d7015cf2e6
commit b0502b1873
3 changed files with 10 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@@ -31,12 +31,12 @@ public class VariableTunnelBuildMessage extends TunnelBuildMessage {
public void readMessage(byte[] data, int offset, int dataSize, int type) throws I2NPMessageException, IOException {
if (type != MESSAGE_TYPE)
throw new I2NPMessageException("Message type is incorrect for this message");
if (dataSize != calculateWrittenLength())
throw new I2NPMessageException("Wrong length (expects " + calculateWrittenLength() + ", recv " + dataSize + ")");
int r = (int)DataHelper.fromLong(data, offset, 1);
if (r <= 0 || r > MAX_RECORD_COUNT)
throw new I2NPMessageException("Bad record count " + r);
RECORD_COUNT = r;
if (dataSize != calculateWrittenLength())
throw new I2NPMessageException("Wrong length (expects " + calculateWrittenLength() + ", recv " + dataSize + ")");
_records = new ByteArray[RECORD_COUNT];
super.readMessage(data, offset + 1, dataSize, TunnelBuildMessage.MESSAGE_TYPE);
}
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ public class VariableTunnelBuildMessage extends TunnelBuildMessage {
throw new I2NPMessageException("Not large enough (too short by " + remaining + ")");
if (RECORD_COUNT <= 0 || RECORD_COUNT > MAX_RECORD_COUNT)
throw new I2NPMessageException("Bad record count " + RECORD_COUNT);
DataHelper.toLong(out, curIndex, 1, RECORD_COUNT);
DataHelper.toLong(out, curIndex++, 1, RECORD_COUNT);
// can't call super, written length check will fail
//return super.writeMessageBody(out, curIndex + 1);
for (int i = 0; i < RECORD_COUNT; i++) {

View File

@@ -33,15 +33,14 @@ public class VariableTunnelBuildReplyMessage extends TunnelBuildReplyMessage {
public void readMessage(byte[] data, int offset, int dataSize, int type) throws I2NPMessageException, IOException {
if (type != MESSAGE_TYPE)
throw new I2NPMessageException("Message type is incorrect for this message");
if (dataSize != calculateWrittenLength())
throw new I2NPMessageException("Wrong length (expects " + calculateWrittenLength() + ", recv " + dataSize + ")");
int r = (int)DataHelper.fromLong(data, offset, 1);
if (r <= 0 || r > MAX_RECORD_COUNT)
throw new I2NPMessageException("Bad record count " + r);
RECORD_COUNT = r;
if (dataSize != calculateWrittenLength())
throw new I2NPMessageException("Wrong length (expects " + calculateWrittenLength() + ", recv " + dataSize + ")");
_records = new ByteArray[RECORD_COUNT];
super.readMessage(data, offset + 1, dataSize, TunnelBuildMessage.MESSAGE_TYPE);
super.readMessage(data, offset + 1, dataSize, TunnelBuildReplyMessage.MESSAGE_TYPE);
}
protected int writeMessageBody(byte[] out, int curIndex) throws I2NPMessageException {
@@ -50,7 +49,7 @@ public class VariableTunnelBuildReplyMessage extends TunnelBuildReplyMessage {
throw new I2NPMessageException("Not large enough (too short by " + remaining + ")");
if (RECORD_COUNT <= 0 || RECORD_COUNT > MAX_RECORD_COUNT)
throw new I2NPMessageException("Bad record count " + RECORD_COUNT);
DataHelper.toLong(out, curIndex, 1, RECORD_COUNT);
DataHelper.toLong(out, curIndex++, 1, RECORD_COUNT);
// can't call super, written length check will fail
//return super.writeMessageBody(out, curIndex + 1);
for (int i = 0; i < RECORD_COUNT; i++) {

View File

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ import net.i2p.data.i2np.DeliveryStatusMessage;
import net.i2p.data.i2np.GarlicMessage;
import net.i2p.data.i2np.I2NPMessage;
import net.i2p.data.i2np.TunnelBuildReplyMessage;
import net.i2p.data.i2np.VariableTunnelBuildReplyMessage;
import net.i2p.router.ClientMessage;
import net.i2p.router.RouterContext;
import net.i2p.router.TunnelInfo;
@@ -83,7 +84,8 @@ public class InboundMessageDistributor implements GarlicMessageReceiver.CloveRec
// as long as there's no reply token (FVSJ will never set a reply token but an attacker might)
((msg.getType() != DatabaseStoreMessage.MESSAGE_TYPE) || (!_client.equals(((DatabaseStoreMessage)msg).getKey())) ||
(((DatabaseStoreMessage)msg).getReplyToken() != 0)) &&
(msg.getType() != TunnelBuildReplyMessage.MESSAGE_TYPE)) {
(msg.getType() != TunnelBuildReplyMessage.MESSAGE_TYPE) &&
(msg.getType() != VariableTunnelBuildReplyMessage.MESSAGE_TYPE)) {
// drop it, since we should only get tunnel test messages and garlic messages down
// client tunnels
_context.statManager().addRateData("tunnel.dropDangerousClientTunnelMessage", 1, msg.getType());